“Late” Term

As pregnancy progresses beyond the 32-week mark, the risk of stillbirth increases week by week. Is it riskier to wait for signs that the baby’s lungs are ready, or do the potential risks of induction outweigh the benefits?

When a baby’s lungs are fully developed, they release chemicals that stimulate an immune response in the mother’s uterus, subsequently triggering the onset of labor. This natural process is not only intelligent but instinctual, emphasizing the importance of respecting the body’s cues during this crucial time.

Research has shown that infant mortality rates at 39, 40, and 41 weeks of gestation are statistically lower than the overall mortality risk associated with expectant management for just one additional week.

The waiting period, while often filled with anxiety and impatience, is significant. It’s vital to note that interventions such as membrane sweeps, pitocin, castor oil, or using herbs to stimulate the onset of labor before the baby indicates readiness do pose risks. These methods do not respect the intelligent timing of unaltered physiological childbirth. Inductions alter the hormones that regulate pregnancy, labor, birth, breastfeeding and attachment.

I encourage you to read the article below to ensure you are making an informed choice on induction and “late” term.

Baby knows when they are ready. Their timing to transition should be respected. There will always be risks, but do not fear, rather become educated. It is not only nature that poses risk, but also intervention. Can you guess which is greater?